Blog

  • Statement: Always Forward, Never Backward

    Statement: Always Forward, Never Backward

    Following the first-ever strike by ITF staff in the history of the organisation, we have held constructive negotiations with ITF management to reach a resolution on outstanding issues arising from the restructuring process.

    In seeking to move forward, there are important lessons that we believe can be drawn from this tumultuous experience:

    1. Meaningfully engaging with staff from the start

    Unlike other global unions facing financial challenges, ITF management went to its board first to secure a mandate for cuts before holding serious conversations with staff representatives. 

    After denying staff the opportunity to engage with the Financial Sustainability Group (FSG), putting forward a non-negotiable 25% cut in 2025 put us on a collision course from the beginning. 

    A poorly-planned consultation process is not a substitute for genuine staff involvement in helping to shape the future direction of the organisation. 

    2. Prioritising equality as a core value

    We can only succeed as an organisation if we practice the values that we preach. We must confront the reality that there are long-standing issues around equality in our workplace.

    We are a less equal organisation as a result of the cuts: 80% of the the more than 40 leavers from the bargaining unit are women.

    Similarly, as it now stands 80% of the 15 current or past union representatives in scope of the change process are not part of the new structure.  

    Serious concerns remain around gaps in the application of legal safeguards for new parents.

    Staff in the Asia Pacific restructure had less access to consultation and protections than their London colleagues, while other colleagues were excluded from the process entirely due to the type of their contracts.

    For all these reasons the existing Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and principle of collective negotiation over changes to terms and conditions of employment remain essential for protecting the rights of ITF staff.

    An evaluation of the use of non-standard forms of employment and unequal treatment towards affected staff is also important if we are to uphold ITF principles going forward. 

    3. Strengthening financial controls and disclosure

    It is hard to accept such an abrupt reduction in the headcount of permanent staff following a period of seemingly unrestrained spending on external consultancy firms.  

    We believe that much more needs to be done to rein-in discretionary spending in areas such as business-class travel, entertaining, expense claims, and corporate consultancy fees to ensure the organisation is financially sustainable.

    4. Ensuring we have a viable strategy to deliver our goals

    We have an ambitious workplan to implement over the next four years, however we now have significantly less capacity.

    We have lost staff in critical areas where the ITF invested significant time and money to distinguish itself. Important activities, which affiliates depend on, are already being cancelled or adversely impacted.

    Although the downsizing process is nearly complete, the strategic conversation on how we achieve our six demands has been absent. We want to ensure the objectives endorsed by Congress are reflected in our financial forecasts and operational plans.

    Significant work intensification and staff burnout may result where cuts have been most severe and vacant positions go unfilled.

    New technologies like AI can be explored but there must be negotiation with staff over their use and longer-term implications. 

    5. Deepening the role of affiliates in governance

    We hope that this experience can serve a greater purpose. We as staff can raise concerns, however ultimately it is for ITF affiliates to decide what kind of organisation they want to steward. 

    We would like to work at a union federation where affiliates are confident that we are moving forward on the right track and are prepared to take a more active role where you feel we can do better.

  • Everything comes back to people

    Everything comes back to people

    The message below was shared with all ITF staff following the last day of work (30 September 2025) for a large number of colleagues departing due to the restructuring process.

    Dear colleagues, 

    As ITF staff we all share a common goal that is meant to guide every decision we make: advancing the rights and wellbeing of transport workers globally. Even when working on an international scale, creating social change is not just about achieving critical mass, it starts with building critical connections. Everything comes back to people. 

    That’s why it hurts so much to say goodbye to so many talented colleagues who have dedicated years of their lives to the ITF and its mission. It is hard to communicate our immense gratitude for their contributions alongside our profound sadness regarding the circumstances leading to their departure. 

    Following our strike last month, we continue to meet with management to seek a resolution to our dispute. We are trying to find common ground on the key issues flagged by members when the proposed agreement was voted down on 11 September: avoiding compulsory redundancies, maintaining redundancy protection going forward, and continuing to have a mechanism to ensure salary and grading are handled fairly. These discussions have been constructive and are ongoing. 

    At the outset of this restructuring process, we raised serious concerns around fairness and equality. We are still waiting for management to provide a revised Equality Impact Assessment (EIA). The initial document did not follow our usual process and failed to meet an acceptable standard, which is to identify and mitigate potential harms before decisions are taken. 

    Our preliminary analysis of staffing changes to the Unite bargaining unit suggests that 80% of the approximately 40 leavers are women. This is worrying in light of ongoing concerns regarding gender inequality in our workplace. 

    No EIA was shared with Asia Pacific staff undergoing a parallel restructuring process, where the scale of changes are even more pronounced.   

    As the restructuring timeline comes to a close, members have approached us with a number of individual and collective concerns that have yet to be resolved by management. Many of these issues have equality considerations including:  

    • Parental rights
    • Flexible working
    • Medical leave
    • Pay fairness  
    • Freedom of expression
    • Basic employment rights

    There are many learnings for the future, not least of which is the need to put in place safeguards to ensure equal treatment for all ITF staff irrespective of their place of work or form of contract.  

    In trying to find a way forward, it is critical that we treat these concerns with due regard and the utmost care. We remain committed to finding a resolution so that we all can return our full attention to the critical work of our organisation. 

    In solidarity, 

    ITF Staff Union

  • Advisory: ITF Staff on Strike 15-18 September

    Advisory: ITF Staff on Strike 15-18 September

    We are writing to inform you that ITF staff are striking from 15-18 September due to insufficient movement by ITF management in redundancy negotiations. 

    A proposal put to the union membership was rejected by 72% on 11 September. Members were not ready to accept a deal that did not provide firm commitments to remedy their widely and deeply felt concerns. 

    Our members have been clear that the restructuring process has been a poorly-managed disaster from start to finish. There has been no mention of the ITF’s six demands in the new structure and how these can be achieved after decimating our organisational capacity. 

    Despite half of London staff applying for “voluntary redundancy”, staff who wish to remain at the ITF are still at risk of compulsory redundancy, including workers with protected status under the law. Management has not committed to protections against a similar fiasco in the future. Concerns over due process and treatment of vulnerable staff, including staff in regions, remain outstanding.

    This situation is not helped by management floating a proposal to freeze staff pay while simultaneously aiming to increase both the minimum and maximum pay rates of senior management roles in order to remain “competitive”. 

    Following rejection of the proposal, management declined to negotiate further to find an agreement that would have allowed us to avoid a strike. They have informed the union that they will not attend our scheduled negotiation meeting on Wednesday 17 September. We are disappointed that ITF management has walked away from the bargaining table at this critical moment. 

    Our strike is a last resort as we seek a positive future for the ITF. As per the press release from our union Unite: “These strike dates coincide with the ITF’s Maritime Roundtable (MRT) in Cyprus. There will be a physical picket line in London along with a virtual picket line globally, in recognition that the work of ITF staff is international and essential to delivering events like the MRT.”

    Our work is global, so too is our picket line. We hope that ITF affiliates will stand with ITF staff so that we can find a fair resolution to our dispute. 

    We remain hopeful that we can resolve this dispute in a way that upholds our trade union principles of fairness and equality. 

    In solidarity, 

    Shop Stewards

    ITF Staff Union (Unite LE1267)

  • International Transport Workers’ Federation staff announce new strike dates to protect jobs

    International Transport Workers’ Federation staff announce new strike dates to protect jobs

    New strike dates confirmed in official press release from Unite the Union.

    Additional strike action announced due to lack of movement by management in redundancy negotiations

    More than 100 workers at the London-based International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) have announced new strike dates in response to planned redundancies and attacks on collective bargaining.

    The workers, members of Unite, are striking after the ITF’s management initiated an organisation-wide restructuring that includes cutting a quarter of the workforce this year.

    In July, the workers voted by 89 per cent for strike action and by 90 per cent for action short of strike action on a turn out of 89 per cent.

    An initial set of strike dates in July were postponed when management committed to act with urgency to progress negotiations.

    Frustration over the lack of movement by management since then has resulted in fresh strike action being announced.

    Unite regional coordinating officer Matt Freeman said: “ITF staff have been put through massive stress and anxiety throughout this restructuring process.

    “Our members had no choice but to call additional strike dates to force management to progress negotiations. They have Unite’s full support.”

    ITF staff will go on strike from 15 to 18 September, while maintaining an overtime ban and work to rule mandate in place from 17 July. Industrial action will continue if the dispute is not resolved.

    These strike dates coincide with the ITF’s Maritime Roundtable (MRT) in Cyprus. There will be a physical picket line in London along with a virtual picket line globally, in recognition that the work of ITF staff is international and essential to delivering events like the MRT.  

    Matt Freeman added: “We continue to be concerned about the proposed redundancies proposed being uneven. Management roles are male dominated, while the majority of the bargaining unit are women workers.

    “We believe it is entirely possible for management to commit to a fair and equal resolution to our dispute without compulsory redundancies.”

  • How to protect the critical work of the ITF

    How to protect the critical work of the ITF

    We return to the bargaining table today with the ITF General Secretary Stephen Cotton to negotiate a fair resolution to our dispute.

    As staff we are advocating to protect jobs and the critical work of the organisation. The cuts being proposed endanger the trade union work we have dedicated years of our lives to supporting.

    We have a mandate to secure the following outcomes:

    • Ensure staff cuts are a last resort
    • Follow due process
    • Commit to financial transparency and accountability
    • Guarantee fairness and equality
    • Move forward with sound planning
  • Our outstanding issues

    Our outstanding issues

    On 28 August, ITF staff union representatives will be meeting with the ITF General Secretary Stephen Cotton, following requests we have made since the restructuring process began in June.

    We remain committed to finding a resolution to this dispute that upholds our trade union principles of fairness and equality, while protecting the critical work of our organisation and putting safeguards in place to prevent such a crisis from re-occurring.

    Our industrial action mandate for both actions short of strike and strike action remains in place and we will be carefully assessing our next steps in relation to the progress we are able to achieve on these important matters.

    Our outstanding issues are organised around five key demands:

    • Protect jobs
    • Uphold our CBA
    • Accountability
    • Equality
    • Sound Planning
  • How Voluntary is “Voluntary Redundancy” at the ITF?

    How Voluntary is “Voluntary Redundancy” at the ITF?

    And what does the number of applications mean for the future of the organisation?

    Staff have voted for industrial action for the first time in the 129-year history of the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF). We are fighting for the future of our organisation, armed with the conviction that our work matters. 

    From brutal cuts to mass “voluntary” departures

    ITF management are seeking to cut 25% of staff roles in the London headquarters this year. This severe reduction in staff is the guiding objective of a poorly-planned restructuring process to find £4 million in cost savings. 

    The uneven cuts being proposed will empty the organisation of critical capacity while magnifying existing inequalities. 

    ITF regional staff are also facing drastic restructures, starting with those in Asia Pacific in a parallel timeline with London.

    Even more worrying is the revelation that 50% of staff in London and Asia Pacific have submitted applications for what management are calling “voluntary redundancy”. 

    Jump before you are pushed out

    If an organisation is looking to reduce headcount responsibly, you would expect a voluntary redundancy process to precede any restructure. 

    First, make an open offer to staff to see who might be ready to leave the workplace, and then see whether any further savings are required to balance the books. 

    This logical sequence is what the staff union proposed, in line with past precedent from 2012, which successfully avoided the need for any compulsory redundancies.  

    Instead, ITF management only opened an organisation-wide “voluntary” redundancy window after sending a large proportion of staff “at risk of redundancy” letters and beginning a formal consultation period on job cuts.

    A great deal of uncertainty remains. Staff can withdraw their applications for a limited period of time and may reconsider when a clearer picture of the new structure is finally presented.  

    Still, it is difficult to describe this decision as “voluntary” for our affected colleagues who have been asked to gamble on their futures.

    • Option 1: Choose to stay and contend for a role in the new structure with no guarantees – risking compulsory redundancy.
    • Option 2: Resign from the ITF and re-enter a tight job market to receive an enhanced “voluntary” redundancy offer. 

    Signs staff are being failed by management 

    Some staff received letters stating that their roles are not at risk, only to subsequently receive letters saying that they are. 

    A number of our colleagues have not received any formal communications and have been excluded from the consultation process, seemingly due to their contract status. 

    Following the close of the consultation, an as yet undetermined number of staff are expected to receive assurances that their jobs are no longer at risk.

    Nevertheless, this 50% figure – which represents over 75 applications from London and Asia Pacific for “voluntary” redundancy – is a clear sign that all is not well. 

    A recent survey found that 94.8% of respondents did not feel they had been provided sufficient information to make an informed decision about their future, while 91.8% indicated that the “change process” had negatively affected their mental or physical health. 

    There is a sense that ITF management started the process with an end goal in mind, but had not done their due diligence to properly plan the complicated logistics of an organisation-wide restructure. 

    This context cannot be ignored as a contributing factor towards the large number of applications for “voluntary” redundancy. 

    The leadership of any organisation should be worried if 50% of its staff would consider leaving rather than remain in their current environment. 

    What does this say about the culture of our workplace, the degree to which people feel valued, and their expectations for the future?

    Tragic loss of organisational capacity

    While we are saddened by this news, we support our colleagues who have had to make these difficult choices. 

    Some may be ready to move on. Many others would prefer to stay, but can’t afford to take the risk and see little prospect of holding onto their employment. 

    We know that each individual has to make the decision that is best for themselves and their families. 

    But make no mistake: this is a tragedy on a collective scale. 

    Hundreds of years in combined experience will disappear. This is a tremendous loss of institutional memory, specialised skills, and relationships with ITF-affiliated unions that dedicated staff members have cultivated over their working lives. 

    After approving an ambitious plan at the ITF Congress in Marrakesh in October 2024, that vision is being jeopardised. 

    Staff have been left feeling they are disposable. There is a widespread lack of understanding about the work we do. 

    During consultations, teams flagged the various ways in which cuts would make it impossible to produce what was committed to in Marrakesh. Management appeared neither particularly surprised nor concerned about this information. 

    At a critical historical moment, the signal being broadcast from the ITF to our fellow trade unionists and to the wider world is that we are retrenching rather than advancing.

    Solidarity is the way forward 

    We are all committed trade unionists. As much as we are concerned about the risks to our livelihoods, we are also deeply concerned about the future of the organisation. 

    We know that our work matters: we’ve been asked to do it by you, the ITF’s affiliated unions. Congress approved a bold plan, not severe cuts. 

    We remain hopeful that we can reach a resolution that upholds trade union values of fairness and equality. 

    For us as staff that means: 

    • Avoiding any compulsory redundancies
    • Upholding our commitment to create a more equal workplace 
    • Recognising the sanctity of our Collective Bargaining Agreement
    • Respecting the rights of regional staff under the ITF Constitution
    • Ensuring responsible stewardship of financial resources
    • And protecting the essential work of our organisation

    We need your support to make this fair resolution a reality. 

  • Update: We’ve Secured Important Progress

    Update: We’ve Secured Important Progress

    As a result of unprecedented compounding pressure from our industrial action mandate, affiliate engagement and public scrutiny, ITF management are finally moving at the bargaining table.

    We carefully considered the employer’s offer and agreed to postpone our Industrial Action dates on 22 and 29 July, while reserving our right to give notice for new strike dates if negotiations fail to progress in a satisfactory manner.

    We have secured:

    • Agreement to extend consultation period to minimum of 80 days, with commitment to use this time to ensure staff concerns are adequately addressed
    • Agreement to provide further financial disclosure
    • Agreement to schedule meeting with ITF General Secretary
    • Commitment to continue negotiations on all other items and to make significant progress by end of July

    While we have achieved an important step forward, our dispute has not been resolved.

    We will need to continue to apply steady pressure to secure a fair resolution.

    Our overtime ban and mandate to “work to rule” remains in full effect.

  • Advisory: ITF Staff Strike and Request for Solidarity

    Advisory: ITF Staff Strike and Request for Solidarity

    We are writing to provide an urgent update on the ongoing dispute at the ITF and to request your solidarity with respect to a rushed and deeply damaging restructuring process.

    Impact of Restructure on All ITF Regions 

    ITF management is proposing to cut approximately 25% of the staff based in London this year. However, the restructuring process is not confined to the head office. This is a global process currently underway in Asia Pacific and planned for all other regions over the next year and half. Staff across all regions face the risk of losing their jobs during this process. 

    The scale of these changes threatens to severely undermine the organisation’s ability to deliver on the ambitious work program agreed at Congress in October 2024.

    ITF staff on non-standard contracts are often the most vulnerable. These workers are being excluded from consultations, and at times given no information about their situations, despite the fact many have worked for the ITF for years doing the same work as permanent staff. 

    ITF management has said that the total number of regional staff will not be cut, but has not given any assurances to existing staff that there will be a place for them in the revised structure with completely new roles. Like their colleagues in London, Asia Pacific staff have been put at risk of redundancy, have been given only vague information about new roles and the process to apply for them, and are struggling to make decisions about their futures. Regional staff have not been afforded any opportunity for collective negotiation over their terms and conditions, contrary to the ITF Constitution.   

    Moreover, while ITF management has said that regional offices will be strengthened with an infusion of new resources, they have not explained where these resources will come from. Staff in London have been told that any cost savings must be used to address the financial deficit. Work across the entire ITF is already suffering due to the chaos caused by the restructure, and will likely be further impacted due to the significant loss of institutional knowledge that comes with high staff turnover in a short period of time.  

    Historic Strike Vote by ITF Staff 

    On 2 July 2025, in response to the proposed changes, ITF staff in London voted overwhelmingly to take industrial action. This marks the first time in ITF’s history that staff have delivered a strike mandate. The turnout was 89% of staff with 89% voting in favour of striking and 90% in favour of an overtime ban and working-to-rule. These results demonstrate the strength of feeling among staff and their commitment to defend their jobs, their colleagues, and the critical work of the ITF.

    In line with this democratic mandate, London-contracted staff will undertake strike action on Tuesday 22 July and Tuesday 29 July 2025. In addition, a continuous overtime ban and work to rule will commence from Thursday 17 July 2025. Further industrial action dates will be announced if there is no progress in negotiations with management.

    ITF Staff Union Proposal 

    Unite, which is the recognised union for ITF staff, made a formal request for an extension to the consultation period – from 55 to 90 days – to allow time for genuine engagement and the development of viable alternatives. This request is foundational to a set of other staff priorities in this process, including disclosure of the financial information which is being used to justify such severe cuts and to which the union is entitled under UK law.

    We of course acknowledge that the ITF has identified financial challenges and that the Executive Board (EB) approved a mandate in April 2025 to find cost savings. We would like to be part of the process of finding solutions. That is why we repeatedly asked for the opportunity to engage with the EB’s Financial Sustainability Group.

    The current proposals from ITF management are destructive and incredibly uneven, with male-dominated management roles being given immunity from the cuts. This is despite the ITF’s returns showing total compensation for management increasing at twice the rate of non-management from 2021 to 2024. Conversely, the proposals would result in downgrading of pay and work intensification in roles where there is a higher concentration of women, among other concerns with the magnification of existing inequalities.  

    Failure to Follow Due Process 

    ITF management have not adhered to our internal policy on restructuring or the dispute mechanism outlined in our Collective Bargaining Agreement. Our formal complaints have not been given a hearing in line with our internal policies. To date, management have only made themselves available for a single day with the UK government’s ACAS mediation service.

    It is also important to note that all 15 current and former union representatives who fall within the scope of the restructure have been put at risk of redundancy. This raises serious concerns about anti-union conduct which must also be addressed, if a constructive and collaborative solution to these challenges is to be found.

    Request for Your Support

    At this crucial moment we are asking all affiliates to stand with ITF staff. Please do not cross our picket line. ITF staff work tirelessly to support transport workers all over the world. Our work is global, so too is our picket line. Refusing to engage with events or meetings organised by ITF management during this period, and to make work requests of ITF staff, is a vital expression of solidarity. 

    We ask you to write directly to the ITF General Secretary to urge him to:

    • Reconsider the refusal to extend the consultation period
    • Provide the financial information requested by staff and their union to enable informed negotiations
    • Ensure that any proposed changes do not magnify existing inequalities for protected groups such as women
    • Commit to a genuinely collaborative and transparent process going forward

    We urge you to raise your voice now in unity with staff to protect the critical work of the ITF. There is still time to reach a fair and sustainable resolution that preserves jobs, respects staff voices and enables the ITF to fulfil its mission. But this will not happen without your engagement.

    Further information available here: www.itfstaffunion.org

  • Complaint: Failure to Ensure Informed and Meaningful Consultation

    Complaint: Failure to Ensure Informed and Meaningful Consultation

    The ITF Staff Union has filed a further complaint alleging that ITF managemet has failed to respect the law and our internal policies on the duty to conduct genuine consultation.

    The ITF has a legal obligation to undertake consultation with staff in relation to the mass redundancy and organisation-wide restructuring process initiated on 2 June 2025.

    As per ACAS, an employer proposing redundancies of this scale “should hold a genuine and meaningful consultation”. For a consultation to be genuine and meaningful, the employer must seriously consider the ideas of those consulted and try to come to an agreement. Crucially, the consultation must be at a point when proposals are at a formative stage, when the employer is open to ideas and when it can substantially influence the outcome.

    The ITF also has an internal policy on restructuring and is party to a Collective Bargaining Agreement with Unite, including for the purposes of negotiation on any changes to terms and conditions of employment. The restructuring policy outlines a clear set of steps that must be followed sequentially.

    These obligations and policies have not been respected. Since its inception the rushed “change process” has been marked by chaos, uncertainty, contradictory information, omissions, and a lack of clear planning or strategic thinking. There is a strong sense that ITF leadership started this process with a clear end goal in mind.

    The union has conducted a survey of our members to gauge their views on this process. We have come to the close of scheduled team consultations, which were meant to provide greater clarity to staff, and the eve of the deadline for “voluntary redundancy” applications, which was extended with the expectation that staff would be provided with all the information they needed by this point to make an informed decision about their future. 

    A majority of unionised workers participated in the survey. Data from respondents is clear: staff have no confidence that genuine consultation has taken place.

    Question 1: Have you been provided clear information about how the change process will impact your employment?

    • Yes: 22.4%
    • No: 77.6%

    Question 2: If you have attended a team consultation session, have you been provided with a clear rationale for the specific changes to your team?

    • Yes: 7.8%
    • No: 92.2%

    Question 3: Have you received satisfactory answers to all of your questions?

    • Yes: 1.8%
    • No: 98.2%

    Question 4: Have you been provided all the information you need to make an informed decision about your future at the ITF?

    • Yes: 5.2%
    • No: 94.8%

    Question 5: Have you been provided with sufficient time to make an informed decision about your future at the ITF?

    • Yes: 8.8%
    • No: 91.2%

    Question 6: Have you been provided all the information you need to suggest alternative proposals that would allow the ITF to avoid compulsory redundancies?

    • Yes: 5.2%
    • No: 94.8%

    Question 7: Do you feel that your alternative proposals would be implemented if sound?

    • Yes: 10.5%
    • No: 89.5%

    Question 8: Is the change process negatively impacting your mental or physical health and/or your ability to do your work effectively?

    • Yes: 91.4%
    • No: 8.6%